|
Post by naf1138 on Dec 12, 2007 11:51:23 GMT -5
Cry freedom for all the disgruntled associates of the world.
Chat, talk, bond, get to know each other. I will let you know when Night starts. Them, you can kill someone.
You can kill each other if you want, and you can chose not to kill if you want.
|
|
|
Post by sachertorte on Dec 12, 2007 11:56:16 GMT -5
Hello scum. Die Die Die. Oh wait.
|
|
|
Post by hazelnutcoffee on Dec 12, 2007 11:57:40 GMT -5
So we can rip ourselves into shreds? Like zombies?
Oh. Um, PM confirmed!
|
|
|
Post by sachertorte on Dec 12, 2007 11:58:32 GMT -5
So our PM didn't tell us who everyone else is. For now I have masked my identity. If you hover over my name it will tell you who I am... But the question is, do we want to know who each other are? Is there a benefit to keeping our identities secret from each other?
I'm thinking no, but I've masked my identity for now just in case.
|
|
|
Post by naf1138 on Dec 12, 2007 12:00:14 GMT -5
So we can rip ourselves into shreds? Like zombies? Oh. Um, PM confirmed! If you want.
|
|
|
Post by sachertorte on Dec 12, 2007 12:05:51 GMT -5
Do we get the Vanilla role PM?
|
|
|
Post by Idle Thoughts on Dec 12, 2007 12:10:05 GMT -5
Woohoo! I'm scum! First time ever.
Here's my role PM
|
|
|
Post by Idle Thoughts on Dec 12, 2007 12:11:09 GMT -5
Uhoh, there's an account screwup. The previous post (and this one) is actually Pleonast. Let me fiddle around.
|
|
|
Post by naf1138 on Dec 12, 2007 12:17:40 GMT -5
hmm, you may want to sign up with a new account Pleo. Just to make things easier.
|
|
|
Post by pleonast on Dec 12, 2007 12:18:39 GMT -5
Hey, sorry for that. I used this board for my Conspiracy game and still had the cookies for the admin account. Good thing I'm scum, or it could've broke the game.
|
|
|
Post by pleonast on Dec 12, 2007 12:23:28 GMT -5
Oh, and just to be clear, I don't actually know the admin account password anymore (assuming Idle changed). The board apparently accepts cookies as authentication even after the admin password has changed. That is actually a serious security problem for the board software. But in any case I can't get back in as admin. (And, didn't poke around, so any other secrets you may have hidden here are still secret to me.)
Are we allowed to discuss strategy yet?
|
|
|
Post by sachertorte on Dec 12, 2007 12:27:57 GMT -5
From the game thread NAF wrote: When he posted this I was fairly certain that 17% referred to 1/6 chance (1/6 = 16.667). The fact that one Dossier fact is labeled (public) and the other five are not seems to point to that as being the 1/6 chance. However, NAF wrote that there is a 17% chance of being outted in 5 days. That's a very different probabilistic situation, and I'm not sure how he gets to 17%.
Anyway, my immediate concern is whether there are any differences between Vanilla PM and Scum PM. I really hope NAF posts the Vanilla color. Also I would like to know that Vanilla players have the same 1 public 5 private dossier set-up. I'm assuming so, since I don't see NAF and mtgman putting such a glaring hole in the design.
Also, it occurs to me that trying to say hidden from each other is futile. Anyone who read a single post of mine from any previous game should know who I am by now.
I think we are pretty much stuck with Pleonast and I having an argument/discussion about dossiers on Day One. It's pretty much unavoidable at this point.
|
|
|
Post by sachertorte on Dec 12, 2007 12:29:27 GMT -5
Are we allowed to discuss strategy yet? I'm assuming we can, since the game has a Night start. Strategizing now doesn't yield any undue advantage.
|
|
|
Post by pleonast on Dec 12, 2007 12:35:57 GMT -5
First, we should all verbatim quote are PMs, so we can see what we have to work with.
My intention is to post my Dossier in the game thread when the Day first starts. It'll be an adulterated Dossier, though, based on what you guys' Dossiers look like.
Sach and me will have a public discussion about revealing Dossiers. I'll be my stubborn foolhardy self and post mine immediately. Hopefully a few Townies will follow my lead. Probably another Scum should post an adulterated Dossier as well. As we get more Townie Dossiers, the later Scum can adjust their lies better.
If a few Townies hold out, Sach can hold out as well. The number of Scum who hold back their Dossiers should be roughly proportional to the number of Townie who do.
|
|
|
Post by pleonast on Dec 12, 2007 12:37:47 GMT -5
Oh, we should discuss if revealing Dossiers is actually pro-Town or not. Once we decide, either Sach or myself can push harder or "lose" the argument as best meets are scummy needs.
|
|
|
Post by naf1138 on Dec 12, 2007 12:41:52 GMT -5
From the game thread NAF wrote: When he posted this I was fairly certain that 17% referred to 1/6 chance (1/6 = 16.667). The fact that one Dossier fact is labeled (public) and the other five are not seems to point to that as being the 1/6 chance. However, NAF wrote that there is a 17% chance of being outted in 5 days. That's a very different probabilistic situation, and I'm not sure how he gets to 17%. Also, vanilla color will be posted, but not until the game actually starts. Anyway, my immediate concern is whether there are any differences between Vanilla PM and Scum PM. I really hope NAF posts the Vanilla color. Also I would like to know that Vanilla players have the same 1 public 5 private dossier set-up. I'm assuming so, since I don't see NAF and mtgman putting such a glaring hole in the design. Also, it occurs to me that trying to say hidden from each other is futile. Anyone who read a single post of mine from any previous game should know who I am by now. I think we are pretty much stuck with Pleonast and I having an argument/discussion about dossiers on Day One. It's pretty much unavoidable at this point. You know what sach, after talking to MtgMan, I think I might have been making that 17% number up. My math skill are...weak...and I was going by what I thought he had said, turns out I wasn't so much right as I was wrong.
|
|
|
Post by sachertorte on Dec 12, 2007 12:42:18 GMT -5
Okay. I think I've figured out the Dossier system. These facts about ourselves are not all unique (I recall NAF's post saying as such). So if a dead man posts that I was killed by a lover of cats. There could be several town with the same (or similar) attribute. So town would know that one of the lovers of cats was scum, but not which one.
Full disclosure is neither pro-town or anti-town. (Pleonast, we may end up arguing about this now. I think we should save it for the Day). If all information is out there, then when death scenes point to someone, that pointing would be likely point to several people. Not good for us, but not terrible either. Hopefully we can exchange a mislynch (or Two!) for a scum lynch.
Plus, we can LIE about our Dossier, but we will need to be quite careful.
We all need to post our Dossier like Pleonast did. Then we can see what info we can put together and hopefully write fake attributes, just in case.
|
|
|
Post by freudianslit on Dec 12, 2007 12:49:40 GMT -5
Finally here. Whoohoo! This time it seems that Idle and I are on the same side. Interesting indeed.
|
|
|
Post by sachertorte on Dec 12, 2007 12:51:23 GMT -5
My intention is to post my Dossier in the game thread when the Day first starts. It'll be an adulterated Dossier, though, based on what you guys' Dossiers look like. That's a very risky move. I'm not sure if the town has matured enough to recognize it as a crazy move by scum. My PM: The very very bad thing about publicly revealing the Dossiers is that the death scene writers will have that information. We need for the death scene writers to be confused. At the very least, we need to change the flavor of each item (except for the public one). As you can see, both Pleonast and I have an item that references "Cheops," but the flavor is different. We don't know what info the dead guys get and whether or not is is muddied or clear.
|
|
|
Post by sachertorte on Dec 12, 2007 12:53:02 GMT -5
Wait. Silly me. The flavor isn't different. They are identical. I think I need lunch.
|
|
|
Post by freudianslit on Dec 12, 2007 12:53:54 GMT -5
ah. Didn't see that Idle is actually Pleo...
Oh, here's my dossier.
|
|
|
Post by oaow on Dec 12, 2007 12:55:27 GMT -5
I think we should be "nice" and kill an oldtimer tonight rather than a newbie
|
|
|
Post by pleonast on Dec 12, 2007 13:05:13 GMT -5
My intention is to post my Dossier in the game thread when the Day first starts. It'll be an adulterated Dossier, though, based on what you guys' Dossiers look like. That's a very risky move. I'm not sure if the town has matured enough to recognize it as a crazy move by scum. I thinks it's doable. If anyone accuses me of scumminess for revealing my Dossier, I'll point to the Bladerunner game as Exhibit A demonstrating that crazy ideas does not indicate anything about alignment. Worst case, I'll be a huge distraction before getting lynched. Hazel, can you post your Dossier?
|
|
|
Post by pleonast on Dec 12, 2007 13:10:31 GMT -5
Let's kill CatInASuit. He's still alive in the Bladerunner game, and so won't be too put out for being insta-killed. By the way, I've put our Dossiers into a Google doc for my convenience, but you all are welcome to view it. Disgruntled Dossiers
|
|
|
Post by freudianslit on Dec 12, 2007 13:13:42 GMT -5
Cool...but the link is saying "page not found" for me.
|
|
|
Post by sachertorte on Dec 12, 2007 13:19:43 GMT -5
We should look at the intro post before deciding who to kill and who should do the killing.
|
|
|
Post by sachertorte on Dec 12, 2007 13:30:49 GMT -5
We should kill the person whose public attribute does not match any of our secret attributes (If there is one). Or the one with the public attribute that overlaps with us the least.
The person doing the killing should be the one whose private attributes match the most innocent public attributes.
|
|
|
Post by freudianslit on Dec 12, 2007 13:34:59 GMT -5
When do we have access to public attributes?
|
|
|
Post by naf1138 on Dec 12, 2007 13:39:13 GMT -5
When do we have access to public attributes? When opening color is posted. I am still waiting on a few more confirms.
|
|
|
Post by freudianslit on Dec 12, 2007 13:43:05 GMT -5
Okay...sachertorte's strategy seems sound.
|
|